Discussion:
Arby's Update
(too old to reply)
JERRY
2009-06-14 07:35:35 UTC
Permalink
Just this week there waws TWO new people at the Arb'ys drive-thru that
reffered to is as Aus Jus Souce, which now that hte total is 3 people,
proves that's the correct way to say it and that is indeed a souce.

NEW ITEMS

Arby's is introducing new Flatbread wrap's. Stay tuned for review's!!!
Sqwertz
2009-06-14 13:45:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by JERRY
Just this week there waws TWO new people at the Arb'ys drive-thru that
reffered to is as Aus Jus Souce, which now that hte total is 3 people,
proves that's the correct way to say it and that is indeed a souce.
You're really grasping at straws here since you finally and
undeniably lost the Taco Bell is Public Property argument - to
yourself no less.

-sw
DK
2009-06-14 23:15:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sqwertz
Post by JERRY
Just this week there waws TWO new people at the Arb'ys drive-thru that
reffered to is as Aus Jus Souce, which now that hte total is 3 people,
proves that's the correct way to say it and that is indeed a souce.
You're really grasping at straws here since you finally and
undeniably lost the Taco Bell is Public Property argument - to
yourself no less.
-sw
Jerry's getting dumber *and* taking a poll at the drive-thru window?

"waws"
"Arb'ys"
"reffered"
"Aus Jus"
"hte"
"souce"

-dk
JERRY
2009-06-17 08:09:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sqwertz
Post by JERRY
Just this week there waws TWO new people at the Arb'ys drive-thru that
reffered to is as Aus Jus Souce, which now that hte total is 3 people,
proves that's the correct way to say it and that is indeed a souce.
You're really grasping at straws here since you finally and
undeniably lost the Taco Bell is Public Property argument - to
yourself no less.
-sw
Jesse simply is WRONG about the issue. Did you not notice that he didn't
refute my irrefutable arguement's? Like you also didn't do? That means the
proof STANDS.
Sqwertz
2009-06-17 13:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by JERRY
Jesse simply is WRONG about the issue. Did you not notice that he didn't
refute my irrefutable arguement's? Like you also didn't do? That means the
proof STANDS.
Yeah - you're not a troll.

Has anybody told you to shut the fuck up recently?

Shut the fuck up.

Shut the fuck up. (That's for tomorrow)

-sw
Mike
2009-06-19 02:07:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sqwertz
Post by JERRY
Jesse simply is WRONG about the issue. Did you not notice that he didn't
refute my irrefutable arguement's? Like you also didn't do? That means the
proof STANDS.
Yeah - you're not a troll.
Has anybody told you to shut the fuck up recently?
Shut the fuck up.
Shut the fuck up. (That's for tomorrow)
-sw
Shut the fuck up! (The day after tomorrow)
Sqwertz
2009-06-17 13:09:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by JERRY
Jesse simply is WRONG about the issue. Did you not notice that he didn't
refute my irrefutable arguement's? Like you also didn't do? That means the
proof STANDS.
Yeah - you're not a troll.

Has anybody told you to shut the fuck up recently?

Shut the fuck up.

Shut the fuck up. (That's for tomorrow)

-sw

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...